.@neiltyson GMO food as such is great. But it should be better for the eater, not better for Monsanto's quarterly earnings reports.
-
-
Replying to @izs
.
@izs : you need to drop some science into your brain: http://www.marklynas.org/2013/01/lecture-to-oxford-farming-conference-3-january-2013/ … /cc@neiltyson2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@neiltyson also, food that's genetically modified via artificial selection isn't the greatest. Qv wheat.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @izs
@izs that's a fine position for someone who has caloric choice; but not an OK as an argument for why others shouldn't. /cc@neiltyson1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@neiltyson My point is, we should be using our godlike powers to improve the health of those who eat the cheapest foods.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@izs : you mean in the US, I take it. Your baseline scenario is busted/privileged. /cc @neiltyson
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.