According to @mattyglesias, "Romney may deserve the edge" on economic policy. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/11/slate_votes_2012_why_we_chose_obama_over_romney_stein_and_johnson.single.html …
-
-
Replying to @binarybits
@binarybits note that it's based on wish-thinking from@mattyglesias's that *Romney* will be the better Keynesian. Oy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@mattyglesias Our experience with George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan provides some support for this thesis, no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @binarybits
@binarybits@mattyglesias : I'm not even sure where to start with that. Big deficits != "good Keynsian". Shoot-first policy != good policy.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@mattyglesias "Big deficits during recessions" isn't Keynesian policy?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @binarybits
@binarybits@mattyglesias : preferably in places with big multipliers to be had. Bonus points for lasting investments with large dividends.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@mattyglesias I don't think the "lasting investments" part has anything to do with Keynesianism.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@binarybits @mattyglesias : right, of course...that's just good policy making ;-)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.