Within the confines of the pipeline. They don't mutate the DOM.
Transferrable, anonymous modules could also work?
I really failed at TC39 by not stopping the train on the toxic combination of:
- no intrinsic module identifier
- lack of anonymous/inline modules
But maybe not too late to repair?
/cc @_shu
-
-
cool use case for workers. def. aware code transfer highly unergonomic right now. inline modules have also come up in context of bundling, i wonder if there is a unifying syntax and semantics for different use cases? (apologies, don't have the full context on this thread.)
-
I tried to unify in that gist by making the inline module a definition only. It would have to be instantiated somehow to run, in either the main thread or a worker. I assumed you could dynamic import to instantiate locally, like: await import(moduleDef);
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah the no inline module thing is pretty bad. I also fought against that and failed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.