Now that we're back to "maybe experts know things?!", perhaps it's time to admit that "full stack" was always a lie.
-
-
Is that a critique towards "full stack" training then? Because you can become "full stack" by focusing on acquiring a more specific (ie: backend, devops, frontend, etc...) knowledge and experience first, and then not be afraid (rather encouraged) to switch later on.
-
The stack is a lie. Fullstack teams traditionally were assembled by managers who valued backend over front end and caused a ton of buggy CSS and inaccessible code. Plus the stack is pointless. I specialize in front end but can easily go end to end for LAMP, MEAN, or JAMstack.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
UX teams already have experience with this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.