Lots of vague terms being thrown around in the discussion around Safari’s storage wipe changes, specifically “web application” and “PWA.”
@adactio makes an important point: is a PWA by definition required to be installed? Oh my—I hope not.https://twitter.com/adactio/status/1243134169380794368 …
-
-
maybe I am misreading your and
@wanderview's replies. That would clear a lot. *Specifically* if you could answer just y/n: other than specific details abt durability/storage differences, is this fundamentally different than ff/chrome in 2 tiers/durable not permanant/use matters? -
At the limit they are the same (origin-wide eviction under pressure). What's different is that we aren't trying to apply more pressure, so incidence of eviction is *wildly* different. In all cases, if users want to keep it, we need to get them to add to install.
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
IDB is already essentially broken for appy sites in Safari 13. It counts the transaction log against storage limits, and never truncates the log while a page is running. You will hit the limit if you're open long enough. See https://github.com/blowery/idb-asplode … / https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202137 …
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
