Legitimate justifications for tool choice flow from user benefit: using X allows us to deliver faster sites, or iterate on feedback from users, or work better with designers (etc. etc.) The common theme among these legit arguments? They can be falsified.
-
-
Show this thread
-
As with most frontend disasters, I see much of this boil down to disengaged management. It's up to TLs, eng managers, and PMs to set the terms of success such that they favour the user.
Show this thread -
Putting and users first is invariably good for business. However, being the user's advocate is sometimes uncomfortable. Good managers reflect the needs of folks *not* in the room.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you follow a lot of modern front end content though it would be easy to get the impression that React (et al) is the only way to make websites now. When I make something with HTML and CSS these days I feel like I’m bucking a trend.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is a lead's job to make those decisions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
