And that is appreciated more than you realize, but it doesn’t equate to “we’re doing this well enough that there’s no need for competing engines with other approaches, needs, and viewpoints”.
-
-
The Blink Launch Process is conscious of this history and does not gate on formal standards phases, but takes a risk-based approach to interop.
-
As before, one has to wonder why you couldn’t just ship behind a flag, with a provided polyfill, *until* those two interoperable implementations existed. Ideally there’s a better answer than “we wanted it now and others weren’t moving fast enough.”
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
IETF has "rough consensus and running code".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
