“engine diversity absolutists”https://twitter.com/slightlylate/status/1221240928918130690 …
In all complex value systems, we have a competing set of values and priorities. We can't debate the relative merits of an approach without at least an exposition of its benefits and costs. Hoping you'll engage beyond hot-quote-takes.
-
-
The purpose of a system is what it does.
-
Indeed. Engine diversity isn't a "thing it does", so we need to debate value to users and developers.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
what seminars do you attend that teach you to talk like this, because we should ban thempic.twitter.com/io6YwnydF7
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course you can, and you have to; "an exposition of benefits and costs" assumes that the putatively competing sets of values are commensurable, which they needn't be and often aren't. Hopefully this will help satisfy some of your request for arguments: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544663?seq=1 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.