Let me try to answer then! May be a bit of a thread. First, the easy, comforting, and misleading way to look at the numbers is to lump mobile into desktop, e.g. the image you pointed to which comes from this data set:https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share#monthly-200901-201911 …
-
-
...and if you can get away with it, you might even put policies in place to prevent competition from ever threatening the proprietary with the open.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This then gets projected on other businesses: They do invest heavily in their native apps and starve mobile web apps on purpose, even though with the same investment it could be even better than native (not on iOS, obviously).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What’s better? A single pseudo-open platform standard that only one vendor can afford to implement and effectively controls by outinvesting everyone else, or multiple competing proprietary platforms? You keep calling Safari the new IE, yet who is doing the embrace&extend here?
-
And speaking of incentives for investing in a platform you effectively control and where the monetizing goes through you, pot meet kettle.pic.twitter.com/Bzr4HjHF3l
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.