I'd love to reply honestly to this. But I'm reminded of what one of my team told me recently about leadership communication:
-
-
Replying to @RickByers @wycats and
1. In any discussion of complex, nuanced topics with 10,000s of people someone will be upset by any meamingful position taken and loose trust in the speaker
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @RickByers @wycats and
2. These days trust is >10x harder to build than to loose
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @RickByers @wycats and
Therefore the optimal strategy for building/preserving trust is to say nothing of any meaning when speaking to large groups. Sigh...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RickByers @wycats and
Clearly we see this play out in global politics these days. What's the implication of this for the evolution of open platforms?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @RickByers @dfabu and
I think this is an erroneous view that is causing Googlers to circle the wagons and become increasingly insular. I'd be happy to have an offline conversation about this but I really don't think the perspective of Google's culture is trending positive.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @wycats @RickByers and
Am I understanding your POV that Googlers becoming insular is *causing* these problems, and that insulation is a vicious cycle? Specifically, is that what you think happened to toast?
7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
IMO, what happened to toast was that folks assumed that Google wants to abuse its market power to ship stuff without going through standardization, and that implementation naturally comes only after standardization. They thought I2I meant "we're done with standardization."
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
And that was clearly a bad-faith argument by many who knew better. Some were genuinely confused. Neither bothered to stop and ask if their assumption of malign intent was correct. SMDH.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @dfabu and
The counter-argument, on behalf of people who don't know you and yr team personally: Google has amp; Google routinely blocks Firefox, and even other chromium browsers from its properties. So the onus is on Google to earn/ prove good faith in standards, not assume it.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Sure, and that's the second group that the first was playing to. That first group is toxic to standards-based progress and should know better.
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate @dfabu and
Fair enough. I wasn't involved in that particular discussion so don't know specifics.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.