I'm skeptical simply changing the name is going to help much (though I do support the name change). There's no longer an assumption of good intent, so any misunderstanding will become an all out attack.
-
-
The counter-argument, on behalf of people who don't know you and yr team personally: Google has amp; Google routinely blocks Firefox, and even other chromium browsers from its properties. So the onus is on Google to earn/ prove good faith in standards, not assume it.
-
I don't think it's fair for the web dev community to cross our arms and say "Google, we assume everything you do is evil. Prove to us that you're worth listening to. I don't know how; that's your problem, not mine."
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, there was genuine confusion about process, which Google has taken positive steps to fix. But I'm not sure how helpful talk of "intent" is. Some of us feared that web features were being developed in a way that made it harder for the community to provide early feedback.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.