Why <details> is Not an Accordion https://daverupert.com/2019/12/why-details-is-not-an-accordion/ … "HTML really needs <accordion> , <tabs>, <dialog>, <dropdown>, and <tooltip> elements. Not more “low-level primitives” but good ol’ fashioned, difficult-to-get-consensus-on elements" by @davatron5000.
100% agree.
-
-
I think the wrong lesson may have been learned here. If “Intent to Prototype” naming had been in place from the beginning, I think toast would still be alive today. IMO, this really was 100% about ppl wrongly saying, “Google’s making toast without asking anybody else’s opinion!”
-
How about we let another team walk into the firing line and find out? I'm not gonna keep volunteering our people wade into a toxic rhetorical cesspool.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
the concerns are valid (that was an unusually short timeline), but i do agree it was an overreaction and i'm normally rather cautious and skeptical of google and its intentions
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
No responsible platform vendor asks their engineers to take lkml-levels of abuse.