So, web components • break a11y • break progressive enhancement (no SSR, broken without JS) • don't work with SVG • share a global namespace instead of being modular • ... Imagine how much tedious moralising we'd see if JS frameworks shipped with similar limitationshttps://twitter.com/sarahmei/status/1198069119897047041 …
-
-
Replying to @Rich_Harris
Devon Govett Retweeted Devon Govett
Requiring CSS to be bundled with JS is also not great.https://twitter.com/devongovett/status/1192949288050933761?s=20 …
Devon Govett added,
1 reply 0 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @devongovett
Rich Harris Retweeted Rich Harris
strong agree! https://twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1188160209224646656 … At least we'll get CSS modules... one day
Rich Harris added,
Rich HarrisVerified account @Rich_Harris(I had a joke here about how HTML, CSS and JS are the languages of the web, and that WC authors who cram markup and styles into their JS classes should come over and#UseThePlatform, but no-one got it. Maybe it'll fare better on Twitter?) pic.twitter.com/H1H51PdmA0Show this thread2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes
You can thank Mozilla for this (killed Imports); that said, primary objections still stand and we all need to do better. It's not an argument against WC to say "it's important to improve this, and we were exogenously constrained"; see constructable stylesheets for ongoing work
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
