@mikeal so it's still about housing and only housing? I'm finding more and more evidence that is not the case.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0813382459/ref=cm_sw_r_sms_apa_i_UIZNDbNE50JKG …https://www.city-journal.org/san-francisco-homelessness …
To Joe's point, though, SF doesn't have nearly enough support infra. That's another bad outcome of shitty zoning. No neighborhood wants them, and city not empowered to build/operate w/o massive fights. See navigation center BS:https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Fate-of-controversial-Navigation-Center-now-in-14037517.php …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
there’s two threads: OMG drugs and OMG too many homeless OMG drugs: the tenderloin isn’t fighting service providers, half the real estate is owned by non-profit service providers already. OMG homeless: yes, by-right zoning would go a long way to improving infra.
-
Umm last I checked these two are painfully related
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.