You presume I have a single step gearing in mind, rather than frantic iteration (including wide review). That's an error not contained in the text.
Is the argument you're making that the web is expressive enough to compete? Or that we don't focus on privacy, security, and performance? Falsifiable claims, if so, and I'd appreciate evidence to support them.
-
-
Perhaps https://www.w3.org/wiki/Evolution might explain my perspective about the role of standards groups in the development process. (See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Apr/0068.html … for status.)
-
... extended to cover other parts of the web platformhttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1T0DRIZGX7Kh52u_S7at6Yeb-TiCGL3pmknr1XaVEx3s/edit#heading=h.1t3h5sf …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
A part of the disconnect is that we're more interested in developer feedback and sentiment than formal WG approval. WG's aren't fitness functions.