Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
slightlylate's profile
Alex Russell
Alex Russell
Alex Russell
@slightlylate

Tweets

Alex Russell

@slightlylate

Chrome Project 🐡 & Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER Named PWAs w/ @phae; probably making her ☕ DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.

San Francisco, The Internet
infrequently.org
Joined December 2010

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Alex Russell‏ @slightlylate 25 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @TedMielczarek

      Did not! Was it ever submitted?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Arthur Stolyar‏ @nekrtemplar 5 Oct 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @slightlylate @TedMielczarek

      This might be the way to distribute alternative browser's on iOS: https://youtu.be/ftyWe6DVvO4  I know there will be some limitations, but hey, whatever works. But probably still not enough to invest in such browser's development.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Alex Russell‏ @slightlylate 6 Oct 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @nekrtemplar @TedMielczarek

      That's the issue; Apple's explicit policy suppresses both extant and potential browser competition. Combined with the worst-in-the-industry feature pace of their engine, a death knell for the web as computing goes mobile.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    4. Rob Palmer‏ @robpalmer2 6 Oct 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @slightlylate @nekrtemplar @TedMielczarek

      I agree with the sentiment that it'd be great to see more feature investment from Apple. If Apple relented on their iOS policy & allowed 3rd-party browser engines, the main effect would be a larger share for browser market leader Chromium. That's a decrease in competition.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    5. Yang Guo (郭扬)‏ @hashseed 6 Oct 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @robpalmer2 @slightlylate and

      Or they could compete by merit?

      1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes
    6. Alex Russell‏ @slightlylate 6 Oct 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @hashseed @robpalmer2 and

      Lots of folks seem to accept that engine diversity is *de facto* desirable. It doesn't take much interrogation of this to see the edges. E.g., what if we had a 100 evenly-distributed engines, but half of them never added any new features? Or only features 2/3 of engines have?

      3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
    7. Alex Russell‏ @slightlylate 6 Oct 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @slightlylate @hashseed and

      In that configuration, it only takes 34% of engines adopting that policy to stall all progress. So we should be clear and specific about what we want engine diversity to achieve. Ability to diverge/go-own-way? Perf competition? Feature pace? Ecosystem resilience?

      3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
    8. Chris Ferdinandi  ⚓️‏ @ChrisFerdinandi 6 Oct 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @slightlylate @hashseed and

      I think we've seen pretty clearly that if it weren't for other engines existing (and even with them), Chrome will kind of ignore the W3C and just do whatever the hell it wants. Monopolies are bad for the web. Always.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    9. Alex Russell‏ @slightlylate 6 Oct 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ChrisFerdinandi @hashseed and

      First, I run standards for Chrome, so I can say categorically that we hold ourselves to a process that is the opposite of "do whatever you want". Next, who do you think the W3C *is*? At TPAC 2 weeks ago, Google sent more engineers and PMs than any two other engines *combined*.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    10. Alex Russell‏ @slightlylate 6 Oct 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @slightlylate @ChrisFerdinandi and

      Our process is documented here: https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features … It *doesn't* gate things on the idea that things have to be standards to be worth adding, but it is more careful in every way about adding risky (new) features than any competing project's process -- *which we all do*.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Alex Russell‏ @slightlylate 6 Oct 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @slightlylate @ChrisFerdinandi and

      If nobody leads, we never go forward. Chromium imposes a high structural tax on leadership to ensure community feedback is at the center of the process, and that risks are low. The WebVR/XR saga show this process at work.

      4:37 AM - 6 Oct 2019
      • 1 Like
      • Arthur Stolyar
      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Alex Russell‏ @slightlylate 6 Oct 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @slightlylate @ChrisFerdinandi and

          There was consensus in the WG circa '17 that the then-current spec would need to be overhauled and wasn't going to be the thing to standardise. Other vendors shipped it anyway!

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Alex Russell‏ @slightlylate 6 Oct 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @slightlylate @ChrisFerdinandi and

          Turned out the group was right. Today's WebXR specs are very different. Chrome prevented "premature compatibility" about a thing which was the wrong design through Origin Trials: https://github.com/GoogleChrome/OriginTrials/blob/gh-pages/developer-guide.md …

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. 7 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info