Not “nobody” and not “everybody.” “Many,” “too many” even build desktop first. “Not enough” build mobile first. Don’t throw out a good technique because lots of people do it wrong.https://twitter.com/slightlylate/status/1180436018333470721 …
-
-
Do you think the issue is really terminology, or more that as a whole developers are self obsessed assholes who project “it works for me” onto everyone else? I know that’s harsh, but this feels More like a lack of professionalism than understanding.
-
See: how some ppl use "semantic code" to refer to the way js bounds to it. Or the classes names methodology. "Accessible" to refer it's available online. "Full-stack" to refer to knowing a js framework. . . .
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree about poor performance on most sites, including ones w/ responsive UIs. But in those cases, the responsive UI is a plus-it's one priority they nailed while failing others. Responsive describes a fluid UI and nothing beyond that. It pairs w/ perf practices that need uptake
-
Anyway, I'd love a holistic term that describes responsible/ethical web delivery, but responsive interfaces should still live within that. We should consider it a win that one good mobile optimization (albeit visual) did take. We still need to sell the stuff that pairs with it.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.