“Google was only member to vote no, while 24 others approved.” Not understating this: where data/privacy policy intersects with competition policy may be the most consequential work of our digital future. It’s where Google holds its power and is failing the public good.https://twitter.com/MattRogerson/status/1177174759597105152 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @jason_kint
Hi Jason, I run standards work in Chrome. The article has been updated with a bit of the appropriate context, but there's both more and less going on than it may appear. First, the "formal objection" mechanism is not well understood. It's a parliamentary procedure of sorts.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
Psst this appears to be a duplicate tweet outside the rest of the thread, FYI
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @CelesteCote
So much for tweeting on the tube!
8:11 AM - 26 Sep 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.