“Google was only member to vote no, while 24 others approved.” Not understating this: where data/privacy policy intersects with competition policy may be the most consequential work of our digital future. It’s where Google holds its power and is failing the public good.https://twitter.com/MattRogerson/status/1177174759597105152 …
-
-
Charters last years, so if we want to get this done soon, it has to be in the charter *now*. A formal model was not in the draft charter, so we used to tool at hand (FO) to require that the chairs and W3C staff respond on the record to this request.
-
At last week's meeting, Google both offered a model document to start from (which was accepted by PING), and continued to press PING to focus on effective, actionable advice to feature designers.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.