“Google was only member to vote no, while 24 others approved.” Not understating this: where data/privacy policy intersects with competition policy may be the most consequential work of our digital future. It’s where Google holds its power and is failing the public good.https://twitter.com/MattRogerson/status/1177174759597105152 …
-
-
For several years, in several fora, we have attempted to convince the PING (the Interest Group at issue) that the best way to help improve privacy is to hold proposals up against a formal model. That is, how much entropy is in the platform or a proposed feature?
-
If privacy matters, grounded analysis matters. Without it, things that seem harmless could be devastating (and vise versa). Without a model, there's precious little way to help feature developers improve at scale.
@w3ctag asked PING for this *repeatedly* in the years I served. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Psst this appears to be a duplicate tweet outside the rest of the thread, FYI
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.