First, if you're a web developer, you are probably reading this on an Apple device. In both computers and smartphones *Apple is a niche player*. 10% of smartphone volume, down from ~12% this time last year. Compare that with ~7% share in computers:https://www.cultofmac.com/618730/q1-2019-pc-market-apple-mac-gartner/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Second, *most* new smartphones are *not* flagship devices -- Apple breaks the mould here as they start at a (much) higher price, but even they sell many more XRs than XSs:https://www.gizmochina.com/2019/09/06/iphone-xr-bestselling-phone-h1-2019/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
Alex Russell Retweeted Alex Russell
Next, nearly all new Androids are slower than *any* new iOS device:https://mobile.twitter.com/slightlylate/status/1139684093602349056 …
Alex Russell added,
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
On the falling volume thing, this is a *good* sign AFAICT. Up until now, the defining property of the aggregate performance curve for mobile has been defined not by the high-end getting faster, but by the low-end getting cheaper & outselling the high-end 3:1 or more.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
Falling overall volume signals that we're getting closer to saturation; that folks who are in the market for a smartphone for the first time is a falling fraction of the total market. When you're shopping for your *second* phone, you really have a sense for why speed matters.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
We've heard this in user studies: folks holding out to upgrade until they can afford a mid-tier device, even though they can afford a new (and much better) low-end device than the one they purchased as their first. Quality matters, but only once basic need has been met.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
Android was *90%* of shipments in Q2. Let that sink in. How much of your focus is on Android?
2 replies 8 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
The web took off on desktop because we got a competitive-enough platform plus a surplus of CPU (for most people) and enough network bandwidth to make sipping UI through a straw work passably. If we're getting to device saturation, that's a hopeful sign for the web.
2 replies 2 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Why? Because we'll start to see the low-end start to climb the performance curve. Current web developer practice is 3-10x too expensive for mobile today. If we can cut our costs to the user by 50 or 80% and CPUs 5x in the next few years, we could actually compete.
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Practically, that still means you need to target something like the Moto G4 for the next few years. But you might not need to aim lower than that (as I've feared since '16).
3 replies 3 retweets 8 likesShow this thread
That leaves the "competitive enough platform" and "good enough network" parts to worry about. Modulo Apple and FB fundamentally undermining the web, we're on a good trajectory re: capabilities. Networks: IDK, but reason to hope.
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate
Slight different topic, but there's a case to be made for Google undermining the open web with its preferential treatment of
@AMPhtml.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.