
News:
read this: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/07/world/americas/mass-shootings-us-international.html …
Note @nytimes fails to call out predatory delay and distraction in headline piece today: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/us/politics/trump-speech-mass-shootings-dayton-el-paso.html …
The "mental illness" and "video games" excuses are *lies*. There aren't "both sides" of a lie 
Reporters don't get into the business because they're fundamentally optimistic about human nature, do they?
-
-
It figured it was sort of like when I worked in security: morbid curiosity fed by terrifying confirmation and a steady stream of "oh, I didn't know it could get *that* bad..."
-
That's probably a good contrast. You never can trust the narrative you hear from anything, the information you have will never be more than piecemeal (except maybe way too after the fact) and you have to make a call in minutes while other people make active changes in real time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I still have no idea on that score. I have to hope so.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
