How to raise a point in TC39, in increasing order of immediacy and decreasing order of appropriateness. Agenda Item: Foo New Topic: Not blocking but Foo Reply: Agree, also Foo Clarifying Question: have we considered Foo? Point of Order: FOO MUST BE CONSIDERED
-
-
Replying to @bterlson
Process Meta-Litigation: Foo is currently Stage N, but with user-space/transpiler impls, I think we can clearly argue for N+2...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
Meta-process Meta-litigation: The process for getting Foo is undesirable. The following process changes would ensure Foo progresses.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bterlson @slightlylate
Did
@ljharb read stage process doc yet this meeting?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I imagine this being read out like Miranda Rights for features. ... "you have the right to remain at Stage N" "you have the right to a Champion" "anything you present can and will be used against you in future attempts to progress" ...
3:30 PM - 25 Jul 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.