What about the other stuff you listed in https://mobile.twitter.com/johnwilander/status/1140290102867812352 … ? And can you clarify attacked? Does that simply mean there was disagreement on the approach and proposal? Is that justification to ship things regardless?
-
-
Also, do the notes really suggest "grandstanding about ITP"? I asked for evidence that the proposed semantics were going to be usable. You can't cleave API style (which is problematic) from semantics that cleanly. APIs have consequences, and they matter.
-
If your recollection of the event is that of courtesy and healthy discussion, I’m sorry for your loss of memory.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
You need to land all the privacy protections in Blink first – Partitioned DOM Storage, partitioned ServiceWorkers, partitioned cache, the Storage Access API, capped expiry of client-side cookies, and URL decoration mitigations. 