To me CustomElements V1 is the API that would have benefited most from origin trials. It was specced unpolyfillable (relying on ES6 syntax) which real dev exposure would have immediately found. Classic failure of backroom standardizationhttps://twitter.com/slightlylate/status/1139626438766673920?s=19 …
-
-
-
Replying to @rwaldron @cramforce
constructor `super()` calls. Other option was (V0's) prototype swizzling.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
They core problem is that to be "truly native", subclasses of host objects and intrinsic types (e.g. Array, Number, etc.) need a way to signal to the runtime that they are "special". For DOM, this means wiring up a C++-side pointer to a backing struture (in ~all impls).
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This has to be done super early in the object's lifetime. In V0, we did this by looking at the swizzled prototype chain at new-time. This allowed the runtime to allocate the required backing data and wire up property lookup to use it. In V1, `super()` has to happen *first*.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Both approaches get you temporally coherent "DOMness", with the syntactic approach opening up the same thing for other intrinsic types at the cost of
@cramforce's regretted compat/polyfillability1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We had a weak preference for syntax, but TC39 took *forever* on intrinsic subclassing (ZOMG), so in V0 we did the dirty thing that also got us polyfilling circa '12 or '13.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate @cramforce
Less about taking forever, more about investing in C[@
@create], then learning that wouldn't fly. Time got gobbled up over that—but I'm glad we didn't go to press with @@create!1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
There were so many twists and turns. @
@create was one of the later plot developments, IIRC.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Indeed, but it was the most "sticky" and stuck around the longest, until it was toast (pardon the pun)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm glad we got syntax, but Web Components should only have ever used it as an optional shortcut for proto swizzling. V1 design is not sufficiently better for the lost time.
-
-
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's what I'm learning here :/
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.