To me CustomElements V1 is the API that would have benefited most from origin trials. It was specced unpolyfillable (relying on ES6 syntax) which real dev exposure would have immediately found. Classic failure of backroom standardizationhttps://twitter.com/slightlylate/status/1139626438766673920?s=19 …
Both approaches get you temporally coherent "DOMness", with the syntactic approach opening up the same thing for other intrinsic types at the cost of @cramforce's regretted compat/polyfillability
-
-
We had a weak preference for syntax, but TC39 took *forever* on intrinsic subclassing (ZOMG), so in V0 we did the dirty thing that also got us polyfilling circa '12 or '13.
-
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.