Big organisations don't feel as though they can just sign away everything carte blanche -- one of their competitors might join a working group that they're a member of and pull in all sorts of stuff they have no interest in giving away into a design -- so WGs are _scoped_
-
-
Chartered WGs of course *want* to take web developer feedback into account the way incubations processes can, but they literally don't have the time...and that's by design.
Show this thread -
Anyhow, if you're a web developer and want to have a big impact on the future of the platform, comments you leave in repos and discourse threads in
@wicg_ shape things at a critical moment: https://wicg.ioShow this thread -
BTW, none of this takes away from the great work that WGs do. They're the big leagues and CGs are the farm teams. We need them both! But we also need to expect reasonable things of each, else we'll always be disappointed.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.