Web standardization according to Google? "Nobody outside my team has reviewed or approved of the explainer in my private repo, but if we implement and encourage devs to use it, surely our competitors will agree to implement it [because our market dominance determines compat]".https://twitter.com/dauwhe/status/1138989015238156289 …
-
-
And
@fantasai, understand that folks in this thread are Blink API OWNERS; it's our (part time) job to push back on folks who try to send an I2S that doesn't demonstrate real and thoughtful iteration and solicitation of feedback. Can reach out *directly* when that isn't happening -
With my
TL hat on, we consciously pay a heavy tax over and above what you're accusing us of *specifically because we spend time soliciting and integrating the feedback some claim we're not asking for*. - 17 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
According to your own I2I documentation, posting an I2I before discussing the feature with other vendors / in relevant standards bodies: https://gist.github.com/dauwhe/065b0c2b4ffae7b00e103e63edab25b9 … According to the WHATWG guidelines, developing your solution before even posting the problem: https://whatwg.org/faq#adding-new-features …
-
WHATWG isn't an incubation forum and we don't use it that way.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.