Is it common for proposed specs to have origin trials in Chrome even before they move to WICG?
More concretely, is there some other concern with things not in WICG going to OT? I can think of many reasons why that might happen (another CG, non-W3C development process, etc.)
-
-
But maybe this is a different concern: some mistakenly think OTs are "pre-launch" rather than at tool for learning about the design space. The primary reason that OTs tend to happen later in design process is the security/privacy/ui signoff it implies, not standards process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The other-CG/other standards body aspect was why I wrote "at least". I'm worried about things that are only in personal repos or Docs.
-
I'm only as worried as they are mature.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.