
Recall that only compatible proposal for that to date was e4x. Syntax has expanded massively since then, creating many grammar hazards. Also: which DOM types are vended? Does ECMA-262 take a hard, circular dep on faster-revving WebIDL or WHATWG DOM spec?
-
-
The problem with e4x is that it returns live DOM nodes. It's not compatible with the functional, re-evaluate-to-update, module that React has popularized. HTML-in-JS needs to return something that's not *yet* DOM.
-
You could return live DOM here too (WC instances). Their lifecycle is composer-defined. JSX folds all assumptions down to React's slowest-of-all-worlds model. Platform would need diversity (alarm template tagging)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.