The process used to ratify ESM is no longer the process. Even by current TC39 standards this was a mistake.
-
-
This sounds like an anti-Babel message. I feel like such a strong codemnationation of a widely used tool that is being actively encouraged by community leaders deserves a more finessed explanation - maybe a blog post?
-
I honestly doubt spending cycles telling web developers not to use a core tool in the most popular framework on philosophical grounds is going to do anyone any good.
@slightlylate should get back to his regularly scheduled program of berating frameworks for payload size. - 24 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don’t think that’s a fair criticism of jsx. It’s an extension to js only. It’s worth interrogating why it’s so popular, and why template functions don’t meet the same needs.
-
It's not an extension, certainly not a compatible one. It doesn't fit in the grammar or syntax.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
As much as I'm a competitor to JSX, and don't like this approach, I think this view is fairly disconnected from web development practice. JSX is as much a "hard fork" of JS as the web platform is (which sometimes and historically gets incompatible extensions)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
