This is so cutting, and it implicates what I see at a technical level in traces too: Silicon Valley grows things without considering the extent to which they are cancers: http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/04/dan-mccomas-reddit-product-svp-and-imzy-founder-interview.html …
This is not a hard line to construct a first-approximation from which we can iterate: public company or part of a top-1000 privately held firm; alternatively, "did founders experience a huge liquidity event?" Google, FB, and Twitter are public. Reddit was bought by Conde Nast.
-
-
But let's get back to the cancer or CO2 analogy: when is growth bad? When it jeopardizes the health of the host. We can diagnose that pretty easily.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.