The fabs will be on whatever node Samsung Semi and TSMC are running at the time. My main skepticism is around chip vendor willingness to scale caches and controllers. Bad track record to bet on.https://twitter.com/bennetyee/status/1030121261077225473 …
-
Show this thread
-
Apple may very well do a great job, but Samsung Semi, Qualcomm, et al? Not holding my breath.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
-
Replying to @eastdakota
Perhaps I'm not understanding. Is the thesis that CN chipmakers will pull an Apple and beef up their SoCs? Or the opposite?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
China has mandate to move off Intel/x86 and is a large enough market to drive both demand and innovation.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eastdakota
Fascinating. Can't wait to see what happens as a result. Consumer pressure to innovate hasn't produced much perf pressure, but server segment will want the real deal (not just more, slower cores)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
The Qualcomm Centriq server processors are actually great for an application like ours. Unfortunately, that project is under the cloud of Qualcomm’s reorg right now.https://blog.cloudflare.com/arm-takes-wing/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Heck, they could single-handedly improve the state of client-side computing by refusing to sell any more of the broke-ass 28nm parts they continue to crank out. It's a scandal.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
