But, in general, transactions that don't create a surplus are weird and suspect. And buybacks such a bad look, even by those standards. Why? A quick tour:
-
Show this thread
-
First, understand that investors provide their capital to businesses in the hopes that mangers will use it wisely to create a return on that investment. That is, they entrust money to others to invest.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Some managers believe they won't be able to grow their businesses further; can't find a good way to spend what they've got and no prospects to invest it well. The usual solution is a dividend: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dividend.asp …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Dividends do not affect the ownership structure of the firm. The same set of owners retain the same % interest in the firm before and after a dividend.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Buybacks, on the other hand, serve to shrink the pool of public owners (shares are bought from public owners and "taken private"). *IN THEORY* buybacks shouldn't affect the price of the stock more than a dividend of equivalent size would.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
...except the tax treatment is different: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/073015/dividend-versus-buyback-which-better.asp …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Further, in the very short term, buybacks look like demand for the stock ("information"), but do not reflect a material change in the prospects for the business. They're old news that looks like new-news. They game the market's information-gathering and pricing system.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
...all while concentrating ownership, giving managers greater power, and depriving the firm of ways to invest in growth. Buybacks should be a red flag, and yet: https://us.spindices.com/indices/strategy/sp-500-buyback-index …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
It should also be disturbing to work at a firm that engages in this sort of thing. It means management is spending time engineering share price increases rather than using cash-on-hand to invest in future growth.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.