The whole weirdness of the non-company town is an assumption that if only the company would get out of the way, the municipality would come together to do things fairly. What *actually* happens is the existing homeowners conspire against the future ones.
-
-
Replying to @dakami @slightlylate and
To say nothing about the renters. And *eventually* the population of future homeowners and renters *is* the workforce for companies. Even their executives. Who will thus, inexorably, either take political power -- or leave.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I think that last point tries to prove too much -- at least when there are multiple employers willing to pay similar wages.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @muni_d1 and
I hear grumbling at VC's, see executives that wouldn't have moved here if they'd known, recognize that all these kids think they're rich while their parents had houses and families but were "middle class" -- And what I see, is a constituency.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
That constituency has a hierarchy of priorities and won't respond to a creeping crisis any better than we are collectively responding to climate change.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @muni_d1 and
The other thing that got me thinking was Amazon's HQ2. Because that also is an experiment in this direction, maybe a last gasp before just building a company town. That's clearly an executive driven decision, and is maybe the last gasp of "can existing municipalities help?"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dakami @slightlylate and
I think there's an active response happening, but it's slow and careful (as you'd expect something of this magnitude to be).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It is not scaled to the problem. See also: climate change.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @dakami and
Consider what an appropriate response would look like: Google, FB, Apple, and Genentech actively lobbying for transit-positive public policy and putting money toward "public/private partnership" on infra. Instead, we have shuttles.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate @muni_d1 and
Would you partner with this public?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
As in, your employees?
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate @muni_d1 and
As in, not your employees. Like, if you had a public that wouldn’t even let you build apartments for your employees, would you build *anything else* with them?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.