Brad makes an important point here: JSX is a proprietary language which is *not* on a trajectory to standardisation. Investing in it means taking on that toolchain *forever*.https://twitter.com/brad_frost/status/1002586347448815616 …
-
-
Thx. I haven't followed the topic much but it seems like same thing could happen to decorators.
-
Yep, it already has in the Stage 2 proposal but that's inherent in the TC39 process until it gets into the language which people forgethttps://twitter.com/left_pad/status/1002527220919947264?s=19 …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Unless we smoosh it again :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
Asking for a friend: what happens if, one day, TC39 wants to add a new syntax/feature to JavaScript that is incompatible with JSX or TypeScript?