Meta-correction: % is probably related to women entering the workforce and so doesn't matter as much. This is less important than I originally thought.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1/2 Isn't the huge increase in women's participation the most obvious explanation for the 1970-2004 decrease in men's?
-
2/2 Why not say, "Since 1970, women have (partially) replaced men in the workforce, leading to a slight increase in overall participation. Separately, there has been a slight decrease in overall participation since 2004."
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
One thing that changed recently is that the amount of labor needed to automate something went down a lot. Manufacturing the McCormick reaper took a lot more people than building Craigslist and probably clobbered around the same # of jobs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.