...women in CS declined from max of 35% in 1980 to more like 20% today, and posited explanation in the article.
I agree that then we can use evidence from other fields to refine concept, ie math is apparently not as male-typed as would've guessed.
-
-
Okay. So: arguendo, literally a full 50% of the differential between male/female dominated careers is accounted for by biological prefs.
-
(As someone w/a sociology degree that seems VERY high to me, but i expect it seems low to other folks, so it's an ok compromise, right?)
-
We literally can't fix that (well, without CRISPR). Fine. Can we please fucking fix the OTHER 50% THOUGH, and not constantly harp on
-
..."bio differences" as if they're an EXCUSE for not fixing the extremely widespread misogyny and racism?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.