Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
slatestarcodex's profile
Scott Alexander
Scott Alexander
Scott Alexander
@slatestarcodex

Tweets

Scott Alexander

@slatestarcodex

I have a place where I say complicated things about philosophy and science. That place is my blog. This is where I make terrible puns.

slatestarcodex.com
Joined June 2013

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. François Chollet‏Verified account @fchollet 28 Jul 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      François Chollet Retweeted Sean Carroll

      We do face credible existential threats, so why focus on fictive ones, like super-intelligence, LHC-created black holes, or alien invasions?https://twitter.com/seanmcarroll/status/891019130626650113 …

      François Chollet added,

      Sean CarrollVerified account @seanmcarroll
      It's not that AI will ruin the world -- it's that it *could*. Given huge unknowns, shouldn't we at least investigate worst-case scenarios? https://twitter.com/dmorey/status/891006510347702272 …
      3 replies 21 retweets 76 likes
    2. Sean Carroll‏Verified account @seanmcarroll 28 Jul 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @fchollet

      Physicists, being responsible human beings, took LHC disaster scenarios very seriously, and investigated them thoroughly.

      5 replies 4 retweets 17 likes
    3. François Chollet‏Verified account @fchollet 28 Jul 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @seanmcarroll

      Likewise most AI researchers take AI risks seriously (e.g. algo bias, job disruption). But no serious expert worried about superintelligence

      7 replies 11 retweets 56 likes
    4. José Luis Ricón Fernández de la Puente‏ @ArtirKel 28 Jul 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @fchollet @seanmcarroll

      Are you sure?http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/05/22/ai-researchers-on-ai-risk/ …

      1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
    5. François Chollet‏Verified account @fchollet 28 Jul 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ArtirKel @seanmcarroll

      Yes I am 100% sure. Cult brochures aren't a source.

      5 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
    6. Andre Infante‏ @AndreTI 29 Jul 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @fchollet @ArtirKel @seanmcarroll

      To anyone who's interested: the 'cult brochure' is an excellent blog by @slatestarcodex and I strongly recommend it.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    7. Scott Alexander‏ @slatestarcodex 29 Jul 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @AndreTI @fchollet and

      Trying to get people to admit existence of future threat from AI, can't even get them to admit the existence of Stuart Russell :(

      2 replies 6 retweets 13 likes
    8. Sherjil Ozair‏ @sherjilozair 29 Jul 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @slatestarcodex @AndreTI and

      Russell rightly identifies value alignment as a problem worth studying, but is hardly in the Musk camp of "evil AI killing everyone soon".

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Scott Alexander‏ @slatestarcodex 29 Jul 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @sherjilozair @AndreTI and

      Russell warns about "species ending problems", and nobody says they're sure that it will be soon.

      4:47 AM - 29 Jul 2017
      • 2 Likes
      • Keshav Kini Hayden Lee
      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Scott Alexander‏ @slatestarcodex 29 Jul 2017
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @slatestarcodex @sherjilozair and

          Russell agrees with everyone else that, although likely far, it would be irresponsible to say impossible soon. Direct quote is (cont)

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. Scott Alexander‏ @slatestarcodex 29 Jul 2017
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @slatestarcodex @sherjilozair and

          "Some have argued that there is no conceivable risk to humanity for centuries to come, perhaps forgetting that the interval of time..."

          1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes
        4. 6 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info