No. They can publish as many bad articles as they want, & I lose reputation each time I try to review them. Effective Gish Gallop strategyhttps://twitter.com/Mjreard/status/865226628527468544 …
That's exactly what global warming denialists say about climatologists.Heck, could be applied to any field.
-
-
i dont really accept that equivalency but there are some commonalities between the debates that even a dummy like me can see
-
This is why I'm so concerned. It seems like "trust scientific consensus, don't deny science" only applies when people like the results.
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
at least in that they ask us to draw strong conclusions about systems too complex (intelligence, climate) to correctly model to that level
-
I don't think people "model" intelligence in the same sense as they "model" climate, and even climate predictions are based on past.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I am not saying I'm 100% sure right, I'm saying when a scientific field agrees on something they deserve to be taken seriously.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's the equivalent of lukewarmers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.