No. They can publish as many bad articles as they want, & I lose reputation each time I try to review them. Effective Gish Gallop strategyhttps://twitter.com/Mjreard/status/865226628527468544 …
I'm not sure there are two papers making or refuting any kind of Bayesian argument.
-
-
No, but there are badly argued informal pieces like this. That's the best anyone has - ergo it can be ignored.
-
(And obviously the book itself, despite some methodological issues, is bayesian evidence for the claim.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.