No. They can publish as many bad articles as they want, & I lose reputation each time I try to review them. Effective Gish Gallop strategyhttps://twitter.com/Mjreard/status/865226628527468544 …
-
-
Replying to @mattyglesias @johndbro1
Your own institution's article basically admits he was right about four out of five things, although it does its best to downplay it.
3 replies 3 retweets 37 likes -
On fifth thing, I agree Vox found ppl who disagree with him, but he represents majority scientific position. See eghttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804158/ …
5 replies 2 retweets 21 likes -
Nations are not the same category as self-defined American races.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Nobody says they are, but nonzero-value proxy. Eg sickle cell anaemia in "socially constructed" blacks.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Ok, but now you're making an argument for extending a consensus view, not citing a consensus view.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm not sure what you mean. I'm saying everyone agrees race is "real enough" for genetic sickle cell.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.