Your own institution's article basically admits he was right about four out of five things, although it does its best to downplay it.
-
-
Being in field is perfectly fine as long as you have the right opinion.
-
sorry im a little unclear as to what you're claiming here?
-
I mean you don't get in trouble for researching race&iq and reporting that it's zero, you get in trouble for researching & saying it's real.
-
if anything, within in the field, much of the funding seems to come from orgs whose agenda is to push race science (e.g. pioneer fund)
-
I think you're neglecting the fact that Pioneer Fund is one fund, and 100% of the rest of society is pushing the opposite.
-
Suppose you want to be a Harvard professor. Would you prefer to have "supported Murray" or "debunked Murray" on resume?
-
Sure. For example, Harvard scientist Steven Jay Gould's refutation of Murray is not very good, but that doesn't prove Murray correct
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.