No. They can publish as many bad articles as they want, & I lose reputation each time I try to review them. Effective Gish Gallop strategyhttps://twitter.com/Mjreard/status/865226628527468544 …
-
-
Replying to @mattyglesias @johndbro1
Your own institution's article basically admits he was right about four out of five things, although it does its best to downplay it.
3 replies 3 retweets 37 likes -
On fifth thing, I agree Vox found ppl who disagree with him, but he represents majority scientific position. See eghttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804158/ …
5 replies 2 retweets 21 likes -
perhaps people who are very interested in racial IQ differences and devote their career to them have certain biases that affect their work?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mtsw @slatestarcodex and
and these sorts of people would both be biased towards confirming murray's conclusions and to thinking he is a worthy figure to engage with
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Agree this is a possibility. Also possible that fact that you'll get physically attacked for claiming diffs is bias against doing so.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
but the people who do stake out ground on this seem to, if anything, enjoy the negative attention
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't think it prevents people from joining field, I think it prevents people from reporting certain conclusions.
-
-
Replying to @slatestarcodex @mtsw and
Being in field is perfectly fine as long as you have the right opinion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
sorry im a little unclear as to what you're claiming here?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.