Your own institution's article basically admits he was right about four out of five things, although it does its best to downplay it.
-
-
but the people who do stake out ground on this seem to, if anything, enjoy the negative attention
-
I don't think it prevents people from joining field, I think it prevents people from reporting certain conclusions.
-
Being in field is perfectly fine as long as you have the right opinion.
-
sorry im a little unclear as to what you're claiming here?
-
I mean you don't get in trouble for researching race&iq and reporting that it's zero, you get in trouble for researching & saying it's real.
-
if anything, within in the field, much of the funding seems to come from orgs whose agenda is to push race science (e.g. pioneer fund)
-
I think you're neglecting the fact that Pioneer Fund is one fund, and 100% of the rest of society is pushing the opposite.
-
Suppose you want to be a Harvard professor. Would you prefer to have "supported Murray" or "debunked Murray" on resume?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
i agree that this exacerbates the tendency for responsibly people not to spend time conducting research in this field, sure
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.