DeBoer is on your side in that one!
-
-
-
He writes "I think the piece undersells the influence of genes on IQ based on extant evidence - not in numbers but general tone ...
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think Vox lied about established science. I think they did an amazing set of contortions to avoid doing so.
-
I think that the punishment for contortions is different from the punishment for lying, especially since it's less clear.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Who's Haier?
-
Also, consider broader implication of supporting principle "never trust any work by person who disagrees with you about race/IQ".
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wait, so it's impossible for eg cosmologists to disagree about the rate of inflation, or doctors about which foods cause heart disease?
-
You're either a liberal and accept honest disagreement, or you're a Stalinist and lock up everyone who disagrees with you.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Your own institution's article basically admits he was right about four out of five things, although it does its best to downplay it.
-
On fifth thing, I agree Vox found ppl who disagree with him, but he represents majority scientific position. See eghttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804158/ …
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.