Exactly. And by the same token, if you're unwilling to say if you are in favor of slavery or not I see no need to listen to your views on
Wait. With the Murray example, say you interpret his views on IQ differently if you know he believes in race. But does (cont)
-
-
it help if he says outright "I believe in race"? It sounds like if he doesn't say anything you're reluctant to engage (cont)
-
..because you merely suspect he might be racist. If he says "I'm racist", how does that make things better rather than worse?
-
If you're not going to engage racists, no point in him admitting. And if you will engage them, why do you care if he is one?
-
Right I am juxtaposing two hard cases. Lindberg has multiple relevant policy views while Murray has no relevant policy views but underlying
-
beliefs which color his research.
-
Those are the hard cases, but the easy case is if you're going to cite some data on UBI first I need to know what your policy preference is
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.