Maybe clearest example is success of evolutionary theory first in biology and then in public acceptance.
(cont) about the science of logic, like what the various fallacies, are or how to use statistics? (cont)
-
-
(cont) Or that 2) people shouldn't criticize others' studies/evidence on political etc topics unless asserting own opinion?
-
The second is the problem I am concerned with. OB people have created and formalized a language of "objection" that denies responsibility
-
(This is, incidentally, one reason I associate them with the political right)
-
Instead of having arguments over object-level issues and values, we have an "objectively" framed language of condescension.
-
After all, if I'm just virtue signaling by opposing the travel ban, who cares if it's a good idea or not?
-
Some months ago one of your 800, 3,000 word posts was a careful dissection of all the evidence for and against DJT's racism.
-
But DJT's racism is not an issue of scholarly interest, its manifestation on the object level is an issue of immediate concern to millions
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.