Thank you for taking the time to explain your perspective. In my view you are describing a theory of change that is not supported by any 1/
Everything good we have, including system that has halved poverty in last 20 years, comes from this kind of thing.
-
-
See https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/03/24/guided-by-the-beauty-of-our-weapons/ … for more discussion of this.
-
I am glad you don't use the "virtue signaling" formulation, since it is bad. Since I seem to have become the anti-evidence person in this
-
Let me repeat that evidence and argumentation are good. I actually like using Twitter to test out different formulations of arguments for
-
My views. But first, I state my views so people can engage my actual views.
-
My objection is to the Twitter of drive-by evidence-challenging instead of engaging on what you hilariously called the "object" level
-
I believe the influence of Cowen, Adams, other OB tweeters has provided a toolbox that people have adopted to avoid engaging on object level
-
I am currently engaged in a parallel Twitter about United enforcing dress code rules which I think is relevanthttps://twitter.com/freequentflyr/status/846070564657778689 …
-
The willingness of people to engage on procedural, instead of substantive, grounds is something that should be resisted where possible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.