If I say "we should have a universal basic income" and you say "the evidence is muddled" only one of us has made an argument.
If you use good methodology, you can only prove things that are true. I would like to help get arguments to that level.
-
-
I write a lot of stuff about my actual beliefs, but it seems pointless unless I can reach the point where they convince peopl
-
If I knew that my arguments would be equally convincing whether true or false, what's the point in making them?
- 56 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.