I personally like the fact that there are many Twitters; I think it's a strength of the platform.
If you can "argue" in 140 characters, you're probably not giving any evidence or addressing any real issues.
-
-
In my view disputing the adequacy of evidence is a way to evade stating your actual views.
-
If I say "we should have a universal basic income" and you say "the evidence is muddled" only one of us has made an argument.
- 68 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.